[151 A.D.2d 474 Page 474] DECISION & ORDER We find unpersuasive the defendant's contention that the court's equitable distribution of the marital
property was not in accordance with Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(5). The court set forth all the factors it considered
and the reason for its determination (see, O'Brien v O'Brien, 66 N.Y.2d 576, on remand 120 A.D.2d 656) which was fully supported
by the record. The plaintiff, who is custodial parent of three of the parties' four children, was properly awarded title
to the marital residence as part of her equitable distribution award (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236[B][5][d][3]).
